Unit 3 · Practice for the Topic 3.2a end-of-topic test
You’ve gone through everything in this topic. The summary video below recaps it all, so you’re ready for the questions.
Watch first: Topic 3.2a summary: everything around an enzyme
Temperature and pH act through collisions, charges and the fold; substrate, enzyme and product set how often an active site is filled; a competitive inhibitor binds the active site, a noncompetitive inhibitor an allosteric site.
Amylase speeds up the reaction starch → maltose. A student adds mercury ions to a tube of purified amylase and starch at 25 °C and pH 7. The temperature and pH do not change, and the mercury ions take part in no reaction. The rate falls from 20 to 4 mg of maltose released per minute.
Which of the following explains how the mercury ions could lower the rate, and what measurement would confirm it?
The graph shows the rate of the same kind of reaction catalyzed by two enzymes: one from a fish that lives in the icy seas around Antarctica and one from a desert lizard.
What is the optimal temperature of each enzyme, and what is happening to the Antarctic fish's enzyme at 35 °C?
Papain, a protease from papaya fruit, speeds up the reaction protein → shorter pieces of protein. A student heats a sample of papain to 85 °C for 10 minutes and cools it to 25 °C. Afterwards the sample's rate is zero, and the rate stays at zero however long the sample is left.
Which of the following describes the papain molecules after the heating?
Cola has a pH of about 3. Black tea has a pH of about 5.
How do the concentrations of hydrogen ions (H⁺) in the two drinks compare?
A researcher tests an enzyme from a bacterium that lives in acidic mine water and an enzyme from a bacterium that lives in a soda lake. Both enzymes speed up the same kind of reaction. The researcher measures each enzyme's rate at 30 °C, with the same substrate concentration, at pH 3, 6 and 9. The rates are in the table.
Which of the following do the results support?
A student gave a fixed amount of a purified enzyme its substrate at five concentrations, with temperature and pH the same in every tube. The initial rates are in the table.
Why does the rate rise steeply from 1 to 4 mmol/L of substrate, yet barely change from 8 to 16 mmol/L?
A weedkiller lowers the rate of a plant enzyme. In leaf extracts with equal amounts of the enzyme, the weedkiller cuts the rate to about half at every substrate concentration tested, from 2 μM to 2,000 μM.
Why does raising the substrate concentration leave the weedkiller's effect unchanged?
In a closed tube, an enzyme speeds up the reaction fumarate → malate (two small molecules of the cell's energy pathway). After 40 minutes the amount of malate has stopped rising, though 33% of the fumarate remains. A sample of the enzyme taken from the tube converts fresh fumarate at its full initial rate.
Which change to the tube would keep the reaction going forward until all of the fumarate is converted?
The graph shows the initial rate of an enzyme from a tapeworm (a gut parasite) at rising substrate concentrations, with and without a fixed amount of a new worm-killing drug. Enzyme amount, temperature and pH were the same in every tube.
Which kind of inhibitor is the drug, and what in the graph shows it?
A results table lists an enzyme's rate as 30 nmol/min and its substrate concentration as 2 μM (micromoles per liter).
Which of the following states what 30 nmol/min means?
(a) Identify the optimal temperature of the amylase among those tested. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: The optimal temperature is 37 °C, because the rate of maltose release is greatest there: 6.0 mg/min.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept 37 °C alone. Do not award the point for 65 °C (the hottest tube) or for 25 °C (the biggest jump from the reading before).
Common slip: Choosing the highest temperature tested, or the temperature with the biggest jump from the reading before it. The optimal temperature is where the rate itself is greatest.
(b) Explain why the rate at 37 °C is higher than the rate at 25 °C. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: At 37 °C the molecules move faster than at 25 °C.
So the amylase molecules and the starch molecules collide more often and with more energy.
More of those collisions carry at least the activation energy, so more collisions succeed each second.
Therefore the rate rises from 3.4 mg/min to 6.0 mg/min.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept faster molecules and more frequent collisions, with the rate rising as the result. Do not award the point for "heat gives the enzyme energy" or "heat lowers the activation energy".
Common slip: Saying only that "heat speeds up reactions". The point needs the molecules moving faster and colliding more often, with more of the collisions succeeding.
(c) Explain, in terms of the enzyme's structure, why the rate at 65 °C is close to zero. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: At 65 °C the heat disrupts the hydrogen bonds and other weak interactions that hold the amylase's fold.
So the active site loses its shape.
The starch no longer fits the active site, so the enzyme can no longer catalyze the reaction: the amylase is denatured.
Denaturation removes working enzymes faster than the extra collisions can help, so the rate is close to zero.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept "denatured" together with the active site losing its shape. Do not award the point for "the peptide bonds break" or for "denatured" with nothing after it.
Common slip: Writing "the enzyme denatures" and stopping, or saying the heat breaks the chain into amino acids. Name what is disrupted, the weak interactions holding the fold. Then follow it to the active site and the substrate.
(d) Evaluate the claim that the 10 °C sample was slowed rather than denatured, using the results after both tubes were brought to 37 °C. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: The claim is supported.
When the 10 °C tube was brought to 37 °C, its rate came back to 5.9 mg/min, almost the full 6.0 mg/min.
So its fold was never lost: the cold had only slowed its molecules.
The 65 °C tube stayed at 0.1 mg/min at 37 °C.
So its fold was lost, because heating that strong pulls the fold apart and it does not re-form.
Therefore the 10 °C sample was slowed, not denatured.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Evaluate needs the judgement and the ground for it. Do not award the point for 'supported' with no data, or for quoting the 10 °C rate alone with no comparison to the 65 °C tube.
Common slip: Giving the judgement without the ground, or the data without the judgement. Evaluate needs both: the claim is supported, because the 10 °C tube recovered and the 65 °C tube did not.
(e) Predict what happens to the amylase's rate when the saliva is swallowed into the stomach, where the pH is about 2, and justify your prediction. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: In the stomach the rate falls to close to zero.
pH 2 is five units below the amylase's optimal pH of about 7, so the concentration of hydrogen ions is a hundred thousand times higher.
The changed concentration of hydrogen ions alters the charges on the R groups.
It also disrupts the hydrogen bonds and other weak interactions that hold the fold.
So the active site loses its shape, and the starch no longer fits.
The amylase is denatured.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept "denatured" with the active site losing its shape, or the two-stage account (charges in the active site changed, then the fold lost). Do not award the point for "the rate rises because there are more hydrogen ions to react" or for "lower" with no reason.
Accept: the far higher concentration of hydrogen ions changes the charges on the R groups in the active site, so the starch no longer binds and the rate falls to close to zero, with or without the fold being named as lost.
Common slip: Predicting a faster rate because there are more hydrogen ions. Hydrogen ions do not take part in the reaction. They change the charges on the R groups and, this far from the optimal pH, pull the fold apart.
(a) Determine the enzyme's optimal pH from the data, and describe how the rate changes on either side of it, using values. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: The optimal pH is 5, because the rate is greatest there: 42 mg/min.
On either side of pH 5 the rate falls.
Below pH 5 the rate falls to 30 mg/min at pH 4 and 8 mg/min at pH 3.
Above pH 5 the rate falls to 20 mg/min at pH 6 and 4 mg/min at pH 7.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Determine needs the decision and the observation it rests on. Accept 'about pH 5' with at least two values quoted for the fall. Do not award the point for pH 7 because it is neutral, or for an optimum with no values.
Common slip: Deciding on pH 7 because pH 7 is neutral, or naming pH 5 with no value to rest it on. Determine needs the decision and the reading it rests on: pH 5 gives 42 mg/min, the greatest rate.
(b) Explain why the rate at pH 6 is lower than at pH 5, given that the fold test shows the enzyme's overall fold intact at both. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: At pH 6 the concentration of hydrogen ions is 10% of the concentration at pH 5.
The changed concentration of hydrogen ions alters the charges on the R groups in and around the active site.
So the milk protein's charges no longer match the pocket as well, and the milk protein binds less well.
Therefore the rate falls to 20 mg/min.
The fold as a whole is intact, so the enzyme is slowed by mismatched charges, not denatured.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept 'the changed concentration of hydrogen ions changes the charges in the active site so the protein binds less well'. Do not award the point for 'the enzyme is denatured at pH 6' (the fold test rules that out) or for 'fewer collisions'.
Common slip: Saying the enzyme is denatured at pH 6. The fold test shows the fold intact. Near the optimum it is the charges in the active site that change, not the shape of the whole protein.
(c) Explain what the results at pH 8 and after the return to pH 5 show about this enzyme. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: At pH 8 the enzyme was denatured: only 15% of its molecules held their fold, and the rate fell to 1 mg/min.
Far from its optimal pH, the changed concentration of hydrogen ions disrupted the weak interactions holding the fold.
Back at pH 5, 92% of the molecules were folded again and the rate returned to 38 mg/min.
So the denaturation was reversible: the pH was restored before the unfolded chains tangled.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept 'denatured at pH 8, but reversibly'. Do not award the point for 'the enzyme was destroyed and replaced' (no cell is present to make new enzyme) or for 'the enzyme was only slowed at pH 8' (the fold test shows the fold lost).
Common slip: Stopping at 'the enzyme was denatured at pH 8'. The point needs the second half: the fold and the rate came back at pH 5, so this denaturation was reversible.
(d) At pH 5, the amount of enzyme is doubled while the tube keeps the same 200 mg of milk protein. Predict how the initial rate and the final amount of protein digested will compare with the original tube, and justify your prediction. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: The initial rate will be about twice as high, roughly 84 mg/min.
Doubling the enzyme doubles the number of active sites the milk protein can bind to, so the protein is converted twice as fast at the start.
The final amount digested will be the same, 200 mg, because 200 mg is all the protein there is.
More enzyme gets to the end sooner, not further.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept 'faster at first, same total in the end' with both reasons. Do not award the point for 'more protein is digested in the end' or for 'the rate is the same because the substrate is the same'.
Common slip: Predicting that more enzyme digests more protein in the end. The final amount is set by the substrate available. The enzyme changes only how quickly that amount is reached.
(a) Explain how the results at 5 μM of sucrose show that L is an enzyme inhibitor. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: With L present the rate falls from 30 to 10 nmol/min.
The enzyme, the sucrose, the temperature and the pH are the same in both tests.
So the only change is the added L.
Therefore L binds to the enzyme and lowers its rate.
A molecule that binds to an enzyme and lowers its rate is an enzyme inhibitor.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept the evidence (only L was added and the rate fell) with the conclusion that L binds the enzyme and lowers its rate (its activity). Do not award the point for "the rate falls" alone, or for "L destroys the enzyme" or "L uses up the sucrose".
Common slip: Writing "the rate falls, so L is an inhibitor" with no link to the enzyme. The point needs the evidence (only L changed) and the conclusion that L binds the enzyme and lowers its rate.
(b) Explain, using L's shape, why fewer sucrose molecules are converted each second when L is present. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: L has almost the same shape as sucrose.
So L fits into the active site and sits there for a while.
While L sits in the active site, no sucrose molecule can enter it.
So fewer sucrose molecules are converted each second, and the rate falls.
L is a competitive inhibitor.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept "L competes with sucrose for the active site". Do not award the point for "L changes the enzyme's shape" or "L binds elsewhere on the enzyme" (that is a noncompetitive inhibitor), or for "L is turned into product".
Common slip: Saying L "changes the enzyme's shape". A molecule shaped like the substrate acts by sitting in the active site itself. The point needs L in the active site, blocking sucrose while it is there.
(c) Predict the rate with L present at 500 μM of sucrose, and justify your prediction. (1 point)
A full-credit answer: With L present, the rate at 500 μM of sucrose will be close to 90 nmol/min.
L leaves the active site after a while, so the active site is often empty.
At 500 μM there are a hundred times as many sucrose molecules as at 5 μM.
So a sucrose molecule reaches each empty active site far more often than L does.
L is outcompeted, and the rate rises close to the uninhibited rate.
Check the box for each point your answer earns
Accept "close to the uninhibited rate" with the competition reasoning. Do not award the point for a rate near 30 nmol/min (a third, as at 5 μM) or for "L is used up" or "L is washed away".
Common slip: Predicting about 30 nmol/min, as at 5 μM. L does not hold a fixed share of the enzyme. With far more sucrose, the empty active site is filled by sucrose almost every time.